Client onboarding
Replace forms, email chains and manual checks with a guided intake that collects documents, runs conflict checks and opens the matter cleanly.
Your firm sells expertise, but too much of the week goes to intake forms, document chasing, time capture and reporting. We build software and AI that carry that load without putting client trust at risk.
Professional services firms run on relationships and judgement, yet the work around that judgement is heavy. Proposals, engagement letters, onboarding, document requests and status updates all need to happen, and someone has to do them. When those tasks live in email and spreadsheets, senior people end up doing admin at night.
We build tools that fit how your firm already works: a client portal that replaces the email thread, a knowledge search over your own documents, an assistant that drafts first versions for a person to review. Confidentiality is a design input, not an afterthought, so access rules and data handling are settled with your team early.
A branded space for documents, approvals and updates that replaces long email threads and repeated status calls.
Find the right clause, precedent or past proposal in seconds, with answers tied to the source document.
First drafts of routine documents, prepared from your templates and past work, always reviewed by a qualified person before use.
Simple ways to record billable work as it happens, so invoices reflect the effort without a Friday reconstruction exercise.
Structured intake forms that collect the right details, check conflicts and route new inquiries to the right partner.
Engagement, utilization and pipeline reports built from one source, so partners see the same numbers in every meeting.
The best starting points are repetitive, document-heavy and already governed by clear rules.
Replace forms, email chains and manual checks with a guided intake that collects documents, runs conflict checks and opens the matter cleanly.
Sort and summarize large document sets, highlight clauses that need attention and let a lawyer confirm every conclusion.
Generate first drafts from approved templates and past engagements, with variables filled from your client and matter records.
Answer common internal questions from your policies, playbooks and reference material, with citations so people can verify the answer.
We interview partners and staff, review the tools in use and identify the tasks that take time without adding client value.
Before building, we agree on data access, confidentiality, retention and who approves what, together with your security and compliance leads.
We deliver a usable slice early, train a small group and expand once the workflow proves calmer than the one it replaces.
We review usage with your people, correct what gets in the way and keep the tool aligned as roles and clients change.
Yes. We can deploy into your cloud account and work within the access rules you set. Where a hosted service makes more sense, we agree the boundaries with your compliance and security teams first.
We ground responses in your own documents and show the source, and we test against real questions before launch. Anything uncertain is passed to a person rather than presented as fact.
In most cases, yes. We connect through its API or a supported export, and we design a fallback for the fields it does not expose.
No. We build around your existing billing model. The aim is to make the record of work more accurate, not to change how you charge for it.
A few hours from the people who do the work, mostly at the start and during demos. Their input is what makes the result usable, so we ask for it early.
Tell us where the admin piles up. We will come back with a clear view of what to automate, what to leave alone and how we would start.